Issues : EE inaccuracies
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The long accent entered into A was quite accurately reproduced in FE; however, GE and EE considered it vague and reduced to a more typical form, i.e. a diminuendo hairpin in GE and a common short accent in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 33-34
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
Bar 33 ends the first side of A, and the R.H. slur written in it clearly suggests a continuation. However, on the new page, in bar 34, there is no completion of this slur. In none of the first editions does the slur extend to bar 34, however, in FE it extends beyond the last note of bar 33, which appears to be an insignificant inaccuracy, even if the engraver's intention was to convey the ambiguous notation of A. In the main text we provide a version with a slur leading to c category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , EE inaccuracies , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
|
b. 65-67
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
It is only GE that include the correct version of the R.H. rest in the 2nd half of b. 65. In A and EE, there is only a minim rest (without a dot), while in FE there is no rest at all. In the 1st half of b. 67, A (→FE→EE) contain only a minim rest too, which suggests that it was considered to be filling a half of the bar (analogously to a semibreve rest). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 127-128
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
Both the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
|
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
in 
2 in bar 34, which we consider a contextual interpretation of 
in b. 127-128 in 
